Tuesday, June 17, 2025
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Ecobuild.club
  • Home
  • Sustainability
  • Insulation
  • Energy Efficiency
  • Eco Build
  • Green Energy
  • Natural Global Resources
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
Ecobuild.club
Home Sustainability

Japan: UN experts ‘deeply disappointed’ by decision to discharge Fukushima water |

16th April 2021
in Sustainability
0
Japan: UN experts ‘deeply disappointed’ by decision to discharge Fukushima water |
0
SHARES
4
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Related posts

‘Plenty of fish in the sea’? Not anymore, say UN experts in Nice

17th June 2025

Global push to end plastic pollution gains ground in Nice

17th June 2025

“The release of one million tonnes of contaminated water into the marine environment imposes considerable risks to the full enjoyment of human rights of concerned populations in and beyond the borders of Japan”, said Marcos Orellana, Special Rapporteur on toxics and human rights, Michael Fakhri,  Special Rapporteur on Right to Food, and David Boyd, Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment in a joint statement. 

‘Very concerning’ 

🇯🇵: UN experts express deep regret at Japan’s decision to release contaminated water from the destroyed #Fukushima nuclear plant into the ocean, noting the potential threats to human health and the environment from the discharge of this radioactive water. https://t.co/moJYvnK2IZ pic.twitter.com/VwKgVOHD2F

— UN Special Procedures (@UN_SPExperts) April 15, 2021

Given the warnings from environmentalists and some governments that the discharge would affect many people as well as the environment at large, the experts called the Government’s decision “very concerning”.  

It comes after years of discussions with communities – including the fishing sector, which was already severely hit by the 2011 disaster – environmental NGOs, neighbouring countries and civil society.  

“The decision is particularly disappointing as experts believe alternative solutions to the problem are available”, they said. 

Fallout 

Noting that the water may contain quantities of radioactive carbon-14, as well as other radioactive isotopes, the independent experts raised their concerns with the Japanese Government that discharging radioactive water to the Pacific Ocean threatens the health of people and planet.  

Meanwhile, in reply to expert concerns, the Japanese Government has suggested that the treated water stored in the tanks was not contaminated.   

However, the experts upheld that the ALPS water processing technology had failed to completely remove radioactive concentrations in most of the contaminated water stored in tanks at the Fukushima Daiichi plant.  

“A first application ALPS failed to clean the water below regulatory levels and there are no guarantees that a second treatment will succeed”, they said, adding that the technology did not remove radioactive tritium or carbon-14.  

Isotope concerns 

While Japan said that the tritium levels are very low and do not pose a threat to human health, scientists warn that in the water, the isotope organically binds to other molecules, moving up the food chain affecting plants and fish and humans. 

Moreover, they say the radioactive hazards of tritium have been underestimated and could pose risks to humans and the environment for over 100 years.    

“We remind Japan of its international obligations to prevent exposure to hazardous substances, to conduct environmental impact assessments of the risks that the discharge of water may have, to prevent transboundary environmental harms, and to protect the marine environment”, the experts concluded. 

Special Rapporteurs and independent experts are appointed by the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council to examine and report back on a specific human rights theme or a country situation. The positions are honorary and the experts are not paid for their work.


Source link

Previous Post

Ocergy’s offshore floating wind solutions attract Series A equity funding

Next Post

FERC clarifies how it will treat carbon pricing in organized wholesale markets

Next Post
FERC clarifies how it will treat carbon pricing in organized wholesale markets

FERC clarifies how it will treat carbon pricing in organized wholesale markets

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Causes of Forest Loss | World Resources Institute

5 days ago

‘Plenty of fish in the sea’? Not anymore, say UN experts in Nice

54 mins ago

From Himalayan melt to drowning shores, children lead the climate fight

8 hours ago

Cattle Methane Inhibitors: Progress and Next Steps

5 hours ago

POPULAR NEWS

  • How Climate Finance Fits into the Global Financial System

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 3 Ways to Secure a Green Transition

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 7 Most Sustainable Guitar Woods & The Brands Using Them

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • UN ocean summit in Nice closes with wave of commitments

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • From Himalayan melt to drowning shores, children lead the climate fight

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Ecobuild.club

ecobuild.club is an online news portal which aims to provide knowledge about Sustainability, Insulation, Energy Efficiency, Eco Build, Green Energy & Natural Global Resources.

Follow us on social media:

Recent News

  • ‘Plenty of fish in the sea’? Not anymore, say UN experts in Nice
  • Global push to end plastic pollution gains ground in Nice
  • Shaping a better world at Expo 2025 in Japan

Category

  • Eco Build
  • Energy Efficiency
  • Green Energy
  • Insulation
  • Natural Global Resources
  • Sustainability
  • Videos

Subscribe to get more!

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2018 EcoBuild.club - All about Eco Friendly Environment !

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Sustainability
  • Insulation
  • Energy Efficiency
  • Eco Build
  • Green Energy
  • Natural Global Resources
  • Videos

© 2018 EcoBuild.club - All about Eco Friendly Environment !